Azumo vs Code Brew Labs: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Azumo (3.9/5) edges ahead of Code Brew Labs (3.6/5) overall. Azumo is the better choice for nearshore agency, verifiable multi-agent framework experience. Code Brew Labs is the stronger option for Disclosed, countable prior AI-agent deployment track record. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Azumo vs Code Brew Labs: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Azumo | Code Brew Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Chandigarh, India |
| Team size | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen | A disclosed deployment count (20+ AI agents across enterprise, fitness, legal, insurance, HR) most boutique competitors on this list don't publish |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangGraph, CrewAI | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare | Financial Services, Healthcare, Technology & SaaS |
Azumo vs Code Brew Labs: overview
Azumo
Azumo is a nearshore software development agency founded in 2016 and headquartered in San Francisco, with roughly 110 employees spread across South America, North America, and Asia. It builds production-grade agentic systems using LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen, coordinating multiple models and tools to complete multi-step business processes. Its smaller headcount means it is better suited to a single dedicated-team engagement than a multi-workstream enterprise program spanning several concurrent teams.
Code Brew Labs
Code Brew Labs is a full-service software and AI agency founded in 2013 and headquartered in Chandigarh, India, with additional offices in Dubai, New York City, and Guadalajara, Mexico, and roughly 368 employees. It builds custom AI agents and chatbots, having deployed 20+ named AI agents across enterprise, fitness, legal, insurance, and human resources sectors, giving it a disclosed deployment count most boutiques on this list don't publish.
Services and capabilities: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Capability | Azumo | Code Brew Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Framework / platform | Azumo | Code Brew Labs |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | ✓ |
| LangGraph | ✓ | N/A |
| AutoGen | ✓ | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Criterion | Azumo | Code Brew Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Dimension | Azumo | Code Brew Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Financial Services, Healthcare, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents, Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Buyers wanting to check a disclosed, countable prior-deployment track record before committing, Fitness, legal, insurance, or HR sector clients wanting sector-relevant agent experience |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Azumo vs Code Brew Labs: pros and cons
| Azumo | |
|---|---|
| + | Named, current production experience across three separate multi-agent orchestration frameworks |
| + | Nearshore staffing (South/North America) keeps time zones aligned with US clients |
| + | ~110-person team stays small enough for direct engineering access without large-firm account layers |
| + | Founded 2016 with a decade of nearshore delivery track record |
| - | Smaller team than the largest firms on this list limits very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public enterprise-scale compliance certifications are less documented than at larger competitors |
| - | Delivery model depends on continued nearshore talent availability across multiple countries |
| Code Brew Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Disclosed count of 20+ AI agents deployed across multiple named sectors |
| + | Multi-country office footprint (India, UAE, US, Mexico) gives global account-management options |
| + | Over a decade of operating history since 2013 |
| + | Full-service model covers mobile, web, and AI agent development under one agency |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Broader full-service agency origins mean agentic-specific depth should be weighed against narrower specialists |
| - | Reported employee counts vary by source, worth confirming directly |
Who should choose Azumo?
A typical fit: building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents.
Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Who should choose Code Brew Labs?
A typical fit: buyers wanting to check a disclosed, countable prior-deployment track record before committing.
A disclosed deployment count (20+ AI agents across enterprise, fitness, legal, insurance, HR) most boutique competitors on this list don't publish. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Healthcare, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Code Brew Labs |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Azumo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Azumo ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Code Brew Labs (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Azumo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
| Use case | Azumo fit | Code Brew Labs fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Buyers wanting to check a disclosed, countable prior-deployment track record before committing | Limited | Strong | Code Brew Labs |
| Fitness, legal, insurance, or HR sector clients wanting sector-relevant agent experience | Limited | Strong | Code Brew Labs |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Azumo vs Code Brew Labs
Azumo (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.
Code Brew Labs (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need Fitness, legal, insurance, or HR sector clients wanting sector-relevant agent experience. If your situation matches that, Code Brew Labs is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Azumo vs Code Brew Labs FAQ
Is Azumo better than Code Brew Labs?
Azumo (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Azumo's strongest advantage: Named, current production experience across three separate multi-agent orchestration frameworks. Code Brew Labs's strongest advantage: disclosed count of 20+ AI agents deployed across multiple named sectors.
How do Azumo and Code Brew Labs differ in pricing?
Azumo uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Code Brew Labs uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Azumo or Code Brew Labs?
Code Brew Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Azumo and Code Brew Labs?
Azumo's primary differentiator is: nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen. Code Brew Labs's primary differentiator is: a disclosed deployment count (20+ AI agents across enterprise, fitness, legal, insurance, HR) most boutique competitors on this list don't publish. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 201–500), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Financial Services, Healthcare).