Azumo
Nearshore agency building production multi-agent systems on LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen.
Founded 2016 | San Francisco, CA, USA | 51–200 employees
multi-agent-systemsagent-orchestrationworkflow-integrationcoding-agents
What is Azumo?
Azumo is a nearshore software development agency founded in 2016 and headquartered in San Francisco, with roughly 110 employees spread across South America, North America, and Asia. It builds production-grade agentic systems using LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen, coordinating multiple models and tools to complete multi-step business processes. Its smaller headcount means it is better suited to a single dedicated-team engagement than a multi-workstream enterprise program spanning several concurrent teams.
Azumo works primarily with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.
Azumo tech stack and services
PythonLangGraphCrewAIAutoGenAWSDockerPostgreSQL
| Service area |
|---|
| Multi-Agent Systems |
| Agent Orchestration |
| Workflow Integration |
| Coding Agents |
Azumo pricing
Short answer: Azumo uses a dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable).
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Staff augmentation | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Azumo does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Azumo pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Named, current production experience across three separate multi-agent orchestration frameworks | -Smaller team than the largest firms on this list limits very large concurrent programs |
| +Nearshore staffing (South/North America) keeps time zones aligned with US clients | -Public enterprise-scale compliance certifications are less documented than at larger competitors |
| +~110-person team stays small enough for direct engineering access without large-firm account layers | -Delivery model depends on continued nearshore talent availability across multiple countries |
| +Founded 2016 with a decade of nearshore delivery track record |
Azumo vs alternatives
How Azumo compares to the other top AI Agent Development agencies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stride Consulting | Senior-only staffing, named proprietary agent. | A named, demonstrable proprietary agent (the '100x agent' for legacy modernization) built by a senior-only agency with no junior bench. | 4.7 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Agency-sized team, long-tenured parent company. | An agency-scale (50–249 person) team combined with a parent company's two-plus-decade delivery track record — unusual for this size bracket. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Vstorm | Boutique agentic-AI-only shop, verifiable AAIF credential. | First AI consultancy accepted into the Agentic AI Foundation, at a genuinely boutique (11–50 person) agency scale. | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Neurons Lab | Fast PoC turnaround, AI-exclusive boutique. | Structured specifically for speed — proof-of-concept agent deployments in as little as two weeks — at an AWS Advanced Tier-certified agency. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| RTS Labs | Pilot-to-production governance, approved-budget buyers. | Boutique US agency explicitly positioned as an alternative to large systems integrators, scoped around the pilot-to-production transition. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Tribe AI | Agency-style staffing, wider frontier-model bench. | A network-staffing model that matches specialists to each engagement, giving access to a wider talent pool than a fixed-bench agency of similar size. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Twistag | Small senior-only agency, large named clients. | An 11–50 person senior-only agency with named large-enterprise clients (Nike, Volkswagen, Autodesk, Sanofi) unusually strong for its size. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| HatchWorks AI | Founder-led mid-size agency, dedicated AI transformation. | A founder-led (Brandon Powell) Atlanta agency with a named AI transformation practice, sized between boutique and enterprise-scale competitors. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Innowise | Agency relationship, enterprise-level bench depth. | The clearest scale-and-capacity winner on this list (3,500+ engineers) among otherwise agency-sized competitors. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Markovate | Pre-agentic LLM pedigree, not a recent entrant. | LLM development and prompt engineering specialization that predates its agentic AI offering, giving agent work a longer internal track record. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Rootstrap | Multi-agent workflows integrated into shipped products. | Known specifically for integrating multi-agent workflows into shipped digital products, not standalone backend automation. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| OpenKit | Tiny security-certified UK agency, well-scoped projects. | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and Cyber Essentials certifications at a 2–10 person micro-agency scale — unusual security rigor for its size. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Kanerika | Existing data-integration clients, agentic AI add-on. | Data-integration and analytics heritage means agentic work is built directly on top of governed data pipelines, not bolted on separately. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Spiral Scout | Agentic AI bundled with full-service software builds. | Fifteen years of full-service custom software delivery (since a 3-person start in 2010) now extended into a dedicated AI implementation practice. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Master of Code Global | Customer-facing agents, two decades of dialogue-system experience. | Twenty years of conversational AI and chatbot delivery history now applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Matellio | One agency for agentic AI plus app modernization. | Serves both startups and Fortune 500 clients from the same agency, giving buyers a reference spectrum matched to company size. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Deviniti | Atlassian ecosystem, checkable marketplace track record. | An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the agency's own claims, applied to agent workflow integration. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Azilen Technologies | One contract, pilot through multi-agent expansion. | Covers the full agentic complexity spectrum under one contract, letting buyers scale from pilot to multi-agent expansion with the same agency. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | Cost-conscious buyers, boutique Baltic agency. | Two decades of Baltic-region delivery history at a lower cost base than Western European agencies. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Curotec | Founder-led US agency, agentic AI on existing web... | A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree with a founder-led, US-headquartered structure, adding agentic AI as an extension of its enterprise web development practice. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| SumatoSoft | Boston HQ, European delivery cost advantage. | US headquarters (Boston) combined with European delivery centers, applying a custom AI-software specialization to agentic development specifically. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| B12 Consulting | Small, deeply technical, physics-founded Belgian agency. | Founded by PhDs in Physics, giving it a research-adjacent, deeply technical culture uncommon among agencies of its size. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Uvik Software | Senior Python engineers, no account-management overhead. | Python-and-Django engineering depth carried directly into AI and agent development, at boutique scale. | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Code Brew Labs | Disclosed, countable prior AI-agent deployment track record. | A disclosed deployment count (20+ AI agents across enterprise, fitness, legal, insurance, HR) most boutique competitors on this list don't publish. | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Emerline | Mid-size agency, LeverX Group parent-company backing. | Operates as part of LeverX Group, giving it parent-company backing and resourcing unusual for an agency of its scale. | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| NP Group | Genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency. | A quarter-century of operating history (since 2001) at a genuinely small (~11 person) agency scale, now including custom AI agent development. | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| BotsCrew | Compact conversational-AI-native agency, customer-facing dialogue. | A decade of dedicated conversational AI/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue. | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| DevCom | Full-lifecycle rigor, design through support. | Full-lifecycle software delivery discipline — planning through production support — applied to agentic AI projects. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | Budget-conscious, production multi-agent systems with guardrails. | Named production experience across four agentic frameworks (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, n8n), including observability and guardrails as standard. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Riseup Labs | Startups needing a lower-cost agentic AI entry point. | South Asian cost base combined with 15+ years of IT services history, aimed at budget-conscious agent projects. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Codebridge Technology | .NET/web stack teams, agentic AI add-on. | .NET and web development specialization applied to agentic AI, aimed at teams already standardized on that stack. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Multi-agent design, deep ERP/CRM, Hackett-backed. | Deep multi-agent architecture and orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Signity Solutions | Cost-conscious, India-based multi-agent process automation. | Explicit, named specialization in multi-agent collaborative system design for business process optimization at an India-based cost point. | 3.5 | Full comparison |
Azumo FAQ
What is Azumo?
Nearshore agency building production multi-agent systems on LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen.
How much does Azumo charge?
Azumo uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Azumo use?
Azumo works with Python, LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, AWS, Docker, PostgreSQL. Primary industries served include Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Is Azumo right for enterprise?
Nearshore agency, verifiable multi-agent framework experience. 51–200 team size. Key consideration: Smaller team than the largest firms on this list limits very large concurrent programs.
What are the best Azumo alternatives?
The best alternatives to Azumo depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Stride Consulting: a named, demonstrable proprietary agent (the '100x agent' for legacy modernization) built by a senior-only agency with no junior bench.
- Tensorway: an agency-scale (50–249 person) team combined with a parent company's two-plus-decade delivery track record — unusual for this size bracket.
- Vstorm: first ai consultancy accepted into the agentic ai foundation, at a genuinely boutique (11–50 person) agency scale.
Compare Azumo with other AI Agent Development agencies
Azumo vs Stride Consulting Azumo vs Tensorway Azumo vs Vstorm Azumo vs Neurons Lab Azumo vs RTS Labs Azumo vs Tribe AI Azumo vs Twistag Azumo vs HatchWorks AI Azumo vs Innowise Azumo vs Markovate Azumo vs Rootstrap Azumo vs OpenKit Azumo vs Kanerika Azumo vs Spiral Scout Azumo vs Master of Code Global Azumo vs Matellio Azumo vs Deviniti Azumo vs Azilen Technologies Azumo vs Cogniteq Azumo vs Curotec Azumo vs SumatoSoft Azumo vs B12 Consulting Azumo vs Uvik Software Azumo vs Code Brew Labs Azumo vs Emerline Azumo vs NP Group Azumo vs BotsCrew Azumo vs DevCom Azumo vs Intuz Azumo vs Riseup Labs Azumo vs Codebridge Technology Azumo vs LeewayHertz Azumo vs Signity Solutions