Azumo vs Matellio: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Azumo (3.9/5) edges ahead of Matellio (3.8/5) overall. Azumo is the better choice for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience.. Matellio is the stronger option for buyers wanting a single agency for both agentic AI and a broader cloud-native application modernization build.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Azumo vs Matellio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Azumo | Matellio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | San Jose, CA, USA |
| Team size | 51–200 | 51–250 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | US buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience. | Buyers wanting a single agency for both agentic AI and a broader cloud-native application modernization build. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangGraph, CrewAI | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare | Technology & SaaS, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing |
Azumo vs Matellio: overview
Azumo
Azumo is a nearshore software development agency founded in 2016 and headquartered in San Francisco, with roughly 110 employees spread across South America, North America, and Asia. It builds production-grade agentic systems using LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen, coordinating multiple models and tools to complete multi-step business processes. Its smaller headcount means it is better suited to a single dedicated-team engagement than a multi-workstream enterprise program spanning several concurrent teams.
Matellio
Matellio is a custom software development agency founded in 2014 and headquartered in San Jose, California, with additional offices in Denver and the UK and engineering labs in India, totaling roughly 150–250 people. Its client base ranges from startups to Fortune 500 companies, giving buyers a broad reference spectrum to request against a specific company-size profile.
Services and capabilities: Azumo vs Matellio
| Capability | Azumo | Matellio |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Azumo vs Matellio
| Framework / platform | Azumo | Matellio |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | ✓ |
| LangGraph | ✓ | N/A |
| AutoGen | ✓ | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Azumo vs Matellio
| Criterion | Azumo | Matellio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Azumo vs Matellio
| Dimension | Azumo | Matellio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Technology & SaaS, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents, Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Bundling agentic AI development with a broader enterprise cloud application modernization build, Fortune 500 buyers wanting reference checks against similarly sized past clients |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Azumo vs Matellio: pros and cons
| Azumo | |
|---|---|
| + | Named, current production experience across three separate multi-agent orchestration frameworks |
| + | Nearshore staffing (South/North America) keeps time zones aligned with US clients |
| + | ~110-person team stays small enough for direct engineering access without large-firm account layers |
| + | Founded 2016 with a decade of nearshore delivery track record |
| - | Smaller team than the largest firms on this list limits very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public enterprise-scale compliance certifications are less documented than at larger competitors |
| - | Delivery model depends on continued nearshore talent availability across multiple countries |
| Matellio | |
|---|---|
| + | Multi-region footprint (San Jose, Denver, UK, India) suits buyers wanting both US-based and offshore delivery |
| + | Serves everything from startups to Fortune 500 clients, giving a broad reference range |
| + | Cloud-native application engineering background helps agents integrate cleanly into modern architectures |
| + | Ten-plus years of operating history at a mid-size, still-agile headcount |
| - | Agentic AI is one offering within a broad custom-software portfolio rather than the sole specialty |
| - | Reported headcount varies notably by source (roughly 147 to 250+), worth confirming directly |
| - | Public case studies emphasize app modernization more than agent-specific outcomes |
Who should choose Azumo?
Azumo is the right choice for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience..
Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Who should choose Matellio?
Matellio is the right choice for buyers wanting a single agency for both agentic AI and a broader cloud-native application modernization build..
Serves both startups and Fortune 500 clients from the same agency, giving buyers a reference spectrum matched to company size.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Azumo vs Matellio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Matellio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Azumo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Azumo |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Azumo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Azumo vs Matellio
| Use case | Azumo fit | Matellio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Strong | Limited | Azumo |
| Bundling agentic AI development with a broader enterprise cloud application modernization build | Limited | Strong | Matellio |
| Fortune 500 buyers wanting reference checks against similarly sized past clients | Limited | Strong | Matellio |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Azumo vs Matellio
Azumo (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Nearshore agency with named production experience across LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen.. It is best for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience..
Matellio (3.8/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting a single agency for both agentic AI and a broader cloud-native application modernization build.. If your situation matches those criteria, Matellio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Azumo vs Matellio FAQ
Is Azumo better than Matellio?
Azumo (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Azumo is better for uS buyers wanting a nearshore agency with named, verifiable multi-agent framework experience.. Matellio is better for buyers wanting a single agency for both agentic AI and a broader cloud-native application modernization build..
How do Azumo and Matellio differ in pricing?
Azumo uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Matellio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Azumo or Matellio?
Matellio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Azumo and Matellio?
Azumo's primary differentiator is: nearshore agency with named production experience across langgraph, crewai, and microsoft autogen.. Matellio's primary differentiator is: serves both startups and fortune 500 clients from the same agency, giving buyers a reference spectrum matched to company size.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 51–250), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Technology & SaaS, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.