NP Group vs LeewayHertz: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
NP Group (3.6/5) edges ahead of LeewayHertz (3.5/5) overall. NP Group is the better choice for small businesses wanting a genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency for a well-scoped custom AI agent project.. LeewayHertz is the stronger option for buyers wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
NP Group vs LeewayHertz: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | NP Group | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2007 |
| HQ | Little Falls, NJ, USA | Gurugram, India |
| Team size | 11–50 | 51–300 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Small businesses wanting a genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency for a well-scoped custom AI agent project. | Buyers wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, React | Python, LangChain, LangGraph |
| Industries served | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS |
NP Group vs LeewayHertz: overview
NP Group
NP Group (New Possibilities Group) is a boutique digital agency founded in 2001 and headquartered in Little Falls, New Jersey, with a small team of roughly 11 employees across North America and Europe. A collection of designers, developers, and internet professionals, it has grown from web design and inbound marketing into custom AI agent development, helping automate tasks and enhance customer interactions. Its 2001 founding date gives it more general operating history than most agencies on this list, even though its AI-specific work is recent.
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz is an AI development agency founded in 2007, with LinkedIn listing its headquarters in Gurugram, Haryana, India and other sources noting a San Francisco corporate office; reported headcount ranges from roughly 180 to 300 employees. The firm was acquired by The Hackett Group on September 16, 2024, which now folds LeewayHertz's agentic AI capability into Hackett's broader enterprise consulting business — a material ownership change buyers should factor into long-term vendor continuity planning.
Services and capabilities: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Capability | NP Group | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Framework / platform | NP Group | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | ✓ |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Criterion | NP Group | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Dimension | NP Group | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Small businesses wanting a long-tenured but genuinely tiny US agency, Buyers prioritizing direct founder access over agency scale | Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments, Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
NP Group vs LeewayHertz: pros and cons
| NP Group | |
|---|---|
| + | A quarter-century of operating history since 2001, unusually long for an agency this small |
| + | Genuinely tiny team (~11 people) means direct founder/senior access on every project |
| + | Design, development, and marketing background gives AI agent work broader product context |
| + | Small overhead structure suits smaller-budget clients well |
| - | Very small team (~11 people) caps capacity to a small number of concurrent engagements |
| - | AI agent development is a newer capability relative to the firm's longer web/marketing history |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly two decades of AI development history since 2007 |
| + | Deep experience with multi-agent orchestration framework selection for complex environments |
| + | Strong ERP/CRM integration experience for enterprise data-rich deployments |
| + | Post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's broader enterprise consulting network |
| - | Acquired by The Hackett Group in September 2024 — a material ownership change that can affect team continuity |
| - | Reported headquarters and headcount vary noticeably across sources, worth confirming directly post-acquisition |
| - | Heavy content-marketing presence means its public profile can outpace independently verified differentiation versus peers of similar size |
Who should choose NP Group?
NP Group is the right choice for small businesses wanting a genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency for a well-scoped custom AI agent project..
A quarter-century of operating history (since 2001) at a genuinely small (~11 person) agency scale, now including custom AI agent development.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS.
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the right choice for buyers wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
Deep multi-agent architecture and orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | NP Group |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | LeewayHertz |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: NP Group (Not published) vs LeewayHertz ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | LeewayHertz |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
| Use case | NP Group fit | LeewayHertz fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small businesses wanting a long-tenured but genuinely tiny US agency | Strong | Limited | NP Group |
| Buyers prioritizing direct founder access over agency scale | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: NP Group vs LeewayHertz
NP Group (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A quarter-century of operating history (since 2001) at a genuinely small (~11 person) agency scale, now including custom AI agent development.. It is best for small businesses wanting a genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency for a well-scoped custom AI agent project..
LeewayHertz (3.5/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. If your situation matches those criteria, LeewayHertz is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
NP Group vs LeewayHertz FAQ
Is NP Group better than LeewayHertz?
NP Group (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. NP Group is better for small businesses wanting a genuinely tiny, long-tenured US agency for a well-scoped custom AI agent project.. LeewayHertz is better for buyers wanting multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
How do NP Group and LeewayHertz differ in pricing?
NP Group uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. LeewayHertz uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: NP Group or LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between NP Group and LeewayHertz?
NP Group's primary differentiator is: a quarter-century of operating history (since 2001) at a genuinely small (~11 person) agency scale, now including custom ai agent development.. LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: deep multi-agent architecture and orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with the hackett group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 51–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.